What's mafia chat?

And this time, I suppose, I'll post my reasonings. I didn't just come up with random numbers, you know.

Apparently, right now, you have several conditions you say you satisfy.

-You have won, but your victory wasn't publically annoounced.
-Your ability is Communicate (classic Mafia power-role?), but you're third-party.
-Your target is Brik, who "just happens" to be one of the Town's most seasoned players.

What's the chance of all of those being true? Not very high, I think.

And then there's the part where the Town is under the effect of the False Dilemma logical policy. Which says you're EITHER Mafia OR a third player who's both won and Town-aligned out of choice.

And then there's the part where you cite stuff that I don't even know is out there, as adressed in my really long post above. Since when was Dephius officially claimed to be Town. Etc.

That was to DJ, by the way.



lol, I'm not.

Mafia chat is the tool Mafia members use to communicate with each other. I think in the introductory guide posted in the first post it says Mafias can talk with one another. So yeah.

Yeah... I kinda didn't read that.

Oh, OK lol

DJ Wizard Cop, please tell me where I voted for Pachino (which you used as evidence against me), and where Deph was officially announced as Town-sided.

I was never officially announced as Town-sided, but on Briks lynching it strongly showed that we weren't mafia brothers.

I think DJ was referring to how I suspected you before that part.

Also, to clarify a previously made point.

Have we considered that he is third-party, but has not won yet? Or he already won, but is helping the Mafia?

Right here, page 19.

This is as close to a confirmation of innocence as you're ever going to get.

Accusation of Pachino, page 6.

I'll address your other points tomorrow. 'Night

The first simply stated that they weren't BOTH Maifa. There's a possibility that it means both arn't Mafia, though, depending in interpretation, I suppose. I see where you're coming from.

The second one wasn't even a vote. And I don't really remember how serious I was being. Back at the start people were just doing stuff for the lulz.

'Night. Sleep well.


So...uhh...what does everyone else think? I'm tired of this being pretty much just DJ Wizard Cop and me.

Comments in bold.

Except no. You're assuming Mafia is a purely logical game. It's not. It wouldn't be too much to ask you to consider how much pressure I have in hammering you, I suppose. Back then, I wanted someone else to contribute to the hammering, as I do now. Hopefully someone more certain than I am.

Seriously, if I played logically I would have already voted you. The evidence suggesting that you are Mafia is ENORMOUS. But of course, I haven't, partially because of the intimidation of possibly getting a mis-lynch.


Nice to see that you have stablized that quickly.


Oh. I'm going to take your word for it on this one. Wish I had knew back then.


Not really :/


People were voting for him without opposition. Yeah, he never got that close. Because I didn't want that to happen. I think he was two votes away, wasn't he? Or three.


Not that you reminded me, your actions don't really match your win objective, does it? This seems like a slip to me.


Pretty sure he was being suspicious. I think he is still being suspicious :<
It's just that evidence suggests that he's really the Cop.
We were pressuered by the deadline while voting for Brik. I think it should be understandable that people rushed it a bit. And I wasn't even the one to hammer on that one.
And yes, I read it too. I kind of gave up after being under the (wrong?) impression that Pokemons are fundamentally neutral, as wild animals. Sorry if that was a mistake on my part.


Well, that was what happened. I'm not sure what else to say, since I already told you what I thought. What is, is; what is not, is not.

Which it doesn't.

Given the recent Mafia games' history, I think it's reasonable to be wary of people following your vote. Those votes build up -quite- fast.


It has? Perhaps I missed something in there.


Yeah. We probably do.

Unfortunately, I will not be here tomorrow, due to Saturday school.

Ugh. This is terribly hard for me to do, but no one else seems to be wanting to take the initiative on the vote. I'm really conflicted as to whether to hammer, since my next post might not come before the deadline. I can vote, but my vote will not have been overseen by the rest of the Town.

Please, someone decide what to do.
And if you guys can't come up with a definite decision, go for the lynch. I will take responsibility for whatever outcome arises. I think the chance we take by far outweighs the drawbacks of a No Lynch.

And in case this might help in your discussion:
I support hammering.

I just can't get over the fact that

>You think I'm Mafia and the "evidence" is "enormous". (Then why don't you vote for me?)
>Mislynching me is "far better" than no lynching and you're in support of hammering. (Again, why don't you hammer then?)
>You won't vote for me for fear of being wrong. (If the evidence is so enormous, how could you possibly risk being wrong?)

That's a rather obvious contradiction, is it not?

Thing is, you want a hammer. Ok. That's reasonable.
You don't want a hammer for fear of being wrong. That's... not quite as reasonable considering the previous statement.
It's blasted obvious that I'm going to show up as a third party and the person who hammered me is going to look scummy.
Since you're scum, you don't want that happening. So, you ask someone else to hammer. Since they'll look scummy and you won't, you can lynch 'em tomorrow after you get rid of me.
That's completely preposterous.

Vote: 135

Two posts above yours, second to last sentence.

Also, just realized that assuming we start with 9 Town-sided players, we'll need every town vote to lynch.

Ugh, Looks like I'll have to do this.
Vote: DJ Wizard Cop


If you're really Town-sided, I'm sorry.
But congratulations on winning. If you really did win.