The way InFamous works is you have a morality system based on choices made throughout the game. "Good" Cole and "Evil" Cole get some very different moves, and some subtle changes with their attacks. An example of this would be the grenades - Good Cole's grenades automatically bind enemies they hit rather than kill them. Evil Cole's split into several smaller grenades when thrown, since he doesn't care at all about bystander casualties.

A "Neutral" Cole wouldn't work, and only having one Cole would disappoint approximately half of the people who enjoyed InFamous. I know a lot of people are a little upset about it, but I honestly think it works well.

I think it would have worked better if they tried to diversify them up a little, at least by making Evil Cole's moveset feel much more chaotic than Cole's like in the inFamous games. Pretty much every move functions almost the same way except the Circle moves, and their level 1 supers are exactly the same.

Though i still like them both.

The squares are the same aswell and Evil Cole's Level 2 and Level 3 are below average: Definitely not better than Cole's supers for sure

I recommend the good Cole for all types of matches but in a stock match: Evil Cole could pretty much be a very dangerous threat.

The squares are the same aswell and Evil Cole's Level 2 and Level 3 are below average: Definitely not better than Cole's supers for sure

Hold on a sec there captain

Evil Cole's Level 2 can be absolutely fantastic, you just have to trick everyone into standing together (Which happens pretty frequently)

Good Cole's is great too, but I wouldn't say one is better than the other.

Good Cole's Leve 3 is definitely better than Evil Cole's, though

Great Looks like there's another addition to the spam famliy say hello Kratos,ratchet,jak and radec >:(

Is Sly being left out of the spam family dinners now?