You know, instead of me overreacting, I'm starting to think that you are. What I said was nothing like what you put there. It is more like this.
"No townie would accuse me of being scum just because I was turned into a roleblocker for that night. However, you did, which makes me think that you are the person who turned me into a roleblocker for that night. I suspect you now."
That's more like what I said.
That's the exact same thing except you just put it into nicer words.
No. Let me compare your version and my version.


Also, if you weren't calling me suspicious, then why was my username next to King Arthur's when you said that me being a roleblocker is the best lead we have right now besides Arthur? Arthur was already very suspicious, and what that sentence implied was that since I was turned into a roleblocker for that night, I am the top scumread next to Arthur.

For the last time already I did not call you suspicious in that particular post, your role change is a LEAD. A L.E.A.D. Do you know what that's means? Investigating your role change will make the next day go faster because we'll obtain reads as people start to react. Those reactions could lead to another potential scum besides Arthur.
I didn't say that you called me suspicious in that paragraph. You're being too defensive.

Blood, I spot a contradiction in your posts.


I don't know what you were trying to prove with this contradiction, though it is definitely not there to help the town.

I never called you suspicious within our little exchange just a moment ago. References back to day one is way out of context of the current situation.
Let me put it like this.
Imagine this, it's day 23 and two players are having a discussion.
Player A: I think we can gather information from your role change.
Player B: Did you just call me suspicious?(Keyword is "just")
Player A:No I haven't called you suspicious since day 1.
Player B: Wait you just contradicted yourself!
Player A: No, because were talking about today not the entire game.
Player B: That doesn't matter.
You see what I'm getting at? We talking about just a few post ago not the entire game.
Blood, the situation is nothing like that. It's more like this.
Player A: You being a roleblocker is the best lead we have besides Arthur.
Player B: But Arthur's really scummy. That already implies that I should be lynched after Arthur.
Player A: Lead and suspect are different.
Player B: Then why did you put my name right next to Arthur's saying that me being a roleblocker is the best lead? As I said, it implied.
Player A: Once again, I did not call you suspicious.
Player B: I didn't say that you called me suspicious. I think you're over-defensive.


EDIT:A lot of people aren't posting in the MG Mafia 13 topic on the MG Forums. Why? :/