and what I mean by that, is obviously, I'm not gonna like a vote on me. But his reasoning is s*** nonetheless.

Unvote, Vote: 135

You've done nothing but say wishy washy things, haven't progressed us in any way, kept on saying V/LA when you'd be gone for like literally a day or few hours, and just a general pain


I'm pretty sure the vote is fine

ie, "easy lynch for scum".

I'll state formally my case against 135 in the next posts.

@Axel: NOOOOO you are not going to get away with it so easily. If 135 post was so bad why didn't you state it? Instead, why did you wait for me to say it? Worse, the vote is a sheer attempt at bandwagon to save your life.

forgive me for having a bad tell of time. it feels like a Wednesday to me, when it's a Friday. you need to calm down.

I am usually V/LA on Wednesdays because my other house doent have internet, and we have to go there for 3 days.

194: maybe because I wasn't online until just moments after you posted? ever think of that?

Gee, thanks for letting us know ahead of time.

isn't the important thing that I let you know?

In all seriousness, I just never thought to mention it until now.

You've said you'll be away about a million times throughout the game and you "never thought to mention it until now"?

Also, if you are going to be away, BE AWAY.

MY. SCHEDULE. CHANGED.

I've said twice for V/LA and came back EARLY.

every time you said V/LA your "schedule changed"

Welcome, Thomas.

Read through the topic and give us your thoughts, please.

Thomas Terminator is back? alright! WB man!

Lemme decipher through most of the filler, and I'll roll in some reads within the hour at the latest.



Yep, I'm back, and thanks lol

As promised, in this post I'll formally state my case against 135.

The first post raising a slight alarm is this one:



This was before the post asking about multi-mafia factions. Now that I read it, it is basically a "middle of the road" post; not taking a real opinion ("kind-of-sort-of"). Also, it calls my attention because he raises the possibility of both being scum, which I find unlikely (being Day 1, scum wouldn't like to bring so much attention over themselves). Being just before an unrelated post asking about the setup, it went quickly forgotten.

Next one is this one:



Again, 135 opens the post right away with a "it could be anything" statement. Later, he covers the scum/scummy issue, which is just answering to a nitpicky statement if anything.

Next one, (which was the first raising my alarms) was this:



Terrible questions (at the specified point it was fairly obvious Axel had a high suspicion level against Geno), useless (asking for further reasoning or motivation would have been a better choice) and appearing as contributing without saying anything.

This one could be a bit nitpicky but



I just realized 135 suggested to end the day RIGHT AFTER AXEL (our best scum bet) CLAIMED role name.
Also, another "cover-all-situations" post.



Again, trying to convey most situations. Also, I just noticed he unvoted a player he wasn't voting; it's almost as if he intended to vote JC first (under inactivity argument) but quickly changed his mind for an easy target. Also, when asked why the vote on Axel, he wasn't able of clarifying and barely stated the "idk his alignment so he's most likely scum" sentence which again, is a fairly bad argument.

In synthesis, 135 has contributed few with his posts (both in quantity and quality), his statements are vague and do not have a posture, he appears in particularly convenient points trying to shift the attention away from the points at the moment, and his votes have poor reasoning.

With this evidence, I'm fairly confident we got scum here. What's your opinion, 135?