I use chrome. For one thing my not-so-good computer, if you didn't know, doesn't have a gig a RAM nor a decent processor. The main thing I like is the speed. I popped up my old firefox again because of you constantly remark it. The pages loaded SO slow, Chrome is like 100x faster and I couldn't probably even LOAD the picture before it could load the PAGE...

So... sorry I cannot finance a computer of value. Is it a problem, to me yes. Do you care? You will probably say get firefox.

Basically, that's because all the extra features of Firefox really bog it down on some machines.

Like mine for example.

Not me, took about 5 minutes to load Google what chrome did in seconds.

When I first boot up my comp, Firefox is an a** to load, after that it's okay.
When I first boot up my comp, Chrome opens almost immediately.

Ladies and Gentlemen we are NOT having another web browser of choice debate in this topic, please take it elsewhere.

Well, Hakker explained this trough.

The idea is simple: if you don't want to change your browser, then that's ok. We respect that.
Now, respect we've browsers and computers that are able to handle those signatures, so they should stay.

If you -a very small minority- can't work it out, then there is nothing we can do.
It's up to you solving it, and we gave you solutions:
A) get a better computer
B) get a different browser
C) Go to the user control panel and make yourself unable to see the signatures.

Besides that, there is nothing we can do for you.

@Fire-fox haters:
Firefox is not lightspeed, but there is a plug-in of firefox 2.0 (not the last one, but 2.0); called "fast-fox". It allows you to navigate hell faster.

@Hakker:
This has nothing to do with democracy. Even if this were a dictatorship, our main objective here is to benefit the most users we can.
Doing what these guys ask will do more damage than good.

Yes, but maybe they don't like it for reasons that can be fixed.
If they would say why, then we could more easily determine and understand their situation and why they think this signature problem needs to be resolved.

Reason #1 Slow as s***.

Nac proved useful by posting an add-on, but that is a downgrade by using an older version though.

Could you please explain? I don't get what you're trying to say here...

He said it himself, it was for an older version of firefox, and also, it does more harm than good, so I am pro-signature. Now changing my web browser? I won't because personal experience. So, now that the conversation is over, I suggest Hakker finished what he started to say, and locks this topic.

Thank you, Fascist.

Ahum.

You're all idiots.




A dictatorship benefits a minority, not a majority.