1. Since 7.
2. I like playing as mafia. Tricking people is just too fun.
3. Still probably band comparer.
4. Gunslinger.
5. Because this game is just too addicting!

1)How long have you been playing mafia?
I dunno, probably a few months.

2)Which alignment do you like playing as the most?(mafia,townie,third-party)
Town. I love lynching scum and uncovering hidden plots.

3)Which role do you like playing the most?
Town Vigilante.

4)Which role do you think you play well as?
Town Doctor, I guess.

5)Why did you join this game?
MAFIA EEZ FUN

Vote: Lucina

1)Since 11, but even longer from my time on MS.

2)Third-party/town: the satisfaction one gets from making a case and lynching a mafiosi cannot be denied.

3)T.testLP. It was absolutely hilarious fooling everyone in All-Stars.

4)Any town role I can confirm: Journalist etc.

5)Because I have nothing going on rn and I need to refine my scumhunting art.
~~~~
Allright, since discussion has not really been instigated(since these questions, no offense, don't really leave much to be commented about), I propose we discuss other matters.

1)What is your view on Lynch All Lurkers?

2)What is your view on Lynch All Liars?

My answers:
1)Lynch all lurkers. they do not give any useful information to the town about their alignment or the alignment of all scumhunting, and are therefore a net detriment to the town. If someone can't post a lot due to RL issues, they should either declare V/LA or replace out. If someone can't post due to a lack of content, they should make their own(reaction tests etc.). There is no excuse not to post.

2)I'm not so sure about lynch all liars. Of course, most liars are scum, but some people as town fakeclaim(glances at Geno), if only to protect themselves. I'll say that I'll cross the bridge when I get there.

Also,
Vote: NIxter

Hello.

1) Perhaps a townie could just be lurking to find scum who are highly opportunistic, the scum obviously trying to lynch the 'lurker'. The townie would probably be lynched before he has a chance to explain himself.

2) Lynch all liars, huh? We won't know whether they're liars or not until we have real concrete proof that they're lying, or that they're telling the truth. But after weighing the drawbacks of not lynching liars and lynching liars, I'd say that I'd go with lynching liars, as they will most likely be mafia, since townies don't usually lie.

Adding stuff on because editing is not allowed.(Is double-posting allowed?)
1) So I'd say that we shouldn't lynch all lurkers. We should look at how much the lurkers have helped the town when they've posted, and try to make an argument from there. If they seem scummy, we lynch them.

Hey, guys, I've got a bit of a cold now, and it's a bit more difficult for me to get reasoning done than usual. Geno, if anybody signs up to be a replacement, just put them in my spot till I get back. If nobody signs up to be one, I'll try to be a bit active.

1. Some people just naturally lurk, even as town. And scum can be active too, so it's kind of situational.

2. Normally, liars are scum because tricking the town into lynching each other is their goal. Town can lie too, if they want to keep the mafia from killing them. Again, situational.

With that being said, Vote: King Arthur

Votecount
Voting Lucina: JamesClyde
Voting TOWK:
Voting [:]:
Voting Nixter: King Arthur, Terra (L-2)
Voting Terra:
Voting JamesClyde:
Voting King Arthur: Lucina

Not voting: Towk, [:], Nixter

With 7 people playing, it takes 4 users to lynch.

But even if they naturally lurk, they're being inherently anti-town, right? There's still no reason not to post.

What if someone is caught in a claim and is found to be lying? Would you lynch them?

Also, we need more activity from Nixter, TOWK and DJ.

Lurking is sorta bad IMO

it's very anti productive and very defensive, which is exactly what scum want

It depends. I usually sit back and weigh things before posting; it just makes my posts more useful. It's better than "I'm posting just to stay active blah blah." Those are my least favorite kind of posts. I do find excessive lurking suspicious, though.

Depending on how my top scum reads react to it, maybe.

Now I have a question: How do you feel about Arthur wanting to be replaced? I find it a bit strange, personally.

@Nixter: Is that really how you feel about lurking or is it just because it's what we want to hear?

Well, I'm not talking about posting just for the sake of posting s okay, if one was lurking for a long period of time, no good is done, if someone posts every other post to appear active and town, yet not providing anything, then that's scummy, too.

filler posts = bad
prolonged lurking = bad
insightful posts = good


that's how I see it

Lucina's right, both LALiars and LALurkers are entirely situational. For the most part though lyncher lurkers isn't productive, as lynching someone who's given no info doesn't help. I prefer to just have them replaced

I can't really make much sense as long as I'm sick, and I thought I mentioned the replacement being just a temp one till I felt better

I'll try to do my best till somebody steps up/I feel better.


To be honest with you, I wish I'd just get a cold when nothing is blooming. Preferably when it's actually cold outside.