Meaning F&F dies, but the thing is that he was never active, anyways... Meaning we don't lose an extremely helpful town player that could turn the tide against the Mafioso. (Now watch him turn out to be Godfather, lol)

Vote: explode

I don't see a problem with this.

Vote: Explode

*Immediately regrets decision and wishes he passed the bomb to Arthur*

The case against Arthur isn't very strong. This way we don't lose anyone important, or we score a hit.

*Would have had fun passing it around*

EVERYONE STOP THE BANDWAGON. THERE ARE 5 SCUM OUT THERE. IT TAKES 8 VOTES TO LYNCH. WE'RE AT 4, UNREMOVABLE VOTES ON "EXPLODE".


Mmhm.

I fail to see why Flash & Flame isn't important. Every single person alive, whether they be town or mafia, contributes to the total number of votes it takes to lynch someone.
This number is divided into town and mafia votes. If the mafia gets this percentage to 50% Mafia, we lose. Thus, it is in our best interests to make the town fraction of this percentage as large as possible.
Randomly killing people will not aid us in our goal.

Everyone who has voted explode after me has done so for completely illogical reasons.
quote="Krillin III"]Vote: explode
LETS SEE THIS f#%$& b$%&# BLOW UP.[/quote]
Please start playing seriously. MG Mafia has a way of lynching those who joke.

As I've said before, an inactive mafia is better than a dead townie, because math.
Watching them turn out to be the Godfather? Are you sure you aren't the Godfather yourself? Lol?
Detonating bombs on people is serious business. I'd appreciate if you had better reasons for doing so.

Why would you even post like that? It's like you're intentionally trying to be scummy.
Now I know Brik probably wants to make a balanced fool and he might have put it in here, but we have more important things to do than lynch you right now.

Case against Arthur coming in my next post.

Actually nevermind, instead I give you a case against Dephius.

Which is it?

Ninja'd

The first one was sarcasm (Aimed at the thing against Deph)

"MG" and "I'm" are two different entities.

Also because there's a faint chance of Krilling listening to me, while I know for a fact that if I told Shoop to play seriously he would probably just vote explode.

...What? Seriously, I don't understand your logic here.

Arthur, why did you justify voting explode by saying "he's inactive anyway" when him being inactive means the bomb will go off on it's own?

If we do lose him, he isn't somebody that has been helping to save the town. (Like Brik in the last game) If we do get a hit, woo. The thing is that it will go off on its own, and he won't pass it, and the only thing that happens differently is that the day ends faster.

I was in a large amount of disbelief and confusion, and yes, I just realized it's my fault for that first quote there. I took it that this:

was the reasoning behind the two votes. That first quote was me improperly posting in a sarcastic manner, asking "Oh, so the only reason we're voting for him is because two seasoned players are? Well that explains it!"

Again, my fault for the lack of clarity.

So to answer your question, it's the second one.

EBWOP: The two votes part should've had "on Arthur" after them.

[:], why would you pass it to an inactive in the first place, then proceed to b**** at people saying we shouldn't bomb that inactive?

Deph did a scummy thing so now he has my scummy read
Brik, does the bomb's detonation end the day?