I think you're overlooking the user "Hakker"

I have had 3 so far on my forum (it's about a TCG). Yours is about ten times bigger.

I find that highly unlikely.

It raises a question, why are hermaphrodites gathering near you?

Lord knows I have no f*** clue. But it still shows intolerance on your part.

Intolerance?

How so?

I don't recall going "DEATH TO ALL HERMAPHRODITES"

Yeah Cadet, quit overracting. Beltha just wondered why they aren't using common nature towards an unnatural person.

Intolerance?

it does not show Intolerance, at all. It shows no negative emotion towards them whatsoever simply not having the option available. Take your politically correct, save-the-world, Illogical, holier than thou garbage and put a sock in it ok?
No really.

No one is forced to conform to anything, we do NOT need to add something so insignificant in the name of 'tolerance'.

Btw i find the need to remind you.

Your s***, does in fact stink.

Oh jeez, guys. Quit over reacting. He's just asking for something for said user(s) to pick. And yes, there was a hermaphrodite on this forum, but it was bomberbanned.

Seriously though, chill out.

Nope, hes calling us 'intolerant' because it never came up as an issue, thats s*** and he knows it.

Besides,. as much as we like to joke, bomber is male. He admitted to being so.

Ultimately, adding it in is unnecessary. Not putting it in can have nothing to do with supposed and ill-perceived 'intolerance'. By his logic, we should probably have text-to-speech software installed on the site, lest we be intolerant to the blind, one could make that case.

There are so many obnoxious and high-horse claims one can make in the shroud of pseudo 'tolerance'. Mercy me if im sick and tired of fools resorting to such tactics to get their way, for some its like the 'easy button'. Just callem intolerant and your wish is granted.

Ive 2 transgendered acquaintances, one thinks they're the most special thing in the world. The other i think of as a dear friend, neither of which would require such an option. You can 'feel' one way, and be the other, but ultimately one defines you. This also goes for supposed herms. There is no special necessity in adding these options, and the fallacy that is the argument of calling one 'intolerant' does not change that.

Meh, w/e.

No, NOT w/e. You have to learn to accept others' differences.

The irony is sickening.
I don't really care to be honest; I just think in the name of correctness it's not a big deal; after all, how hard could it be to add a third option?

His point was to be Ironic, glad you picked up on that. It was made to satire you, though you didnt seem to catch it. He was parodying (perhaps without meaning to) the forceful (and hypocritical) nature of your 'tolerant' behavior.

And it isnt too big of a deal, the big deal was you clearly drew the line of whose 'good' and 'bad' by admonishing everyone else as intolerant. Thats what got you such a response. This wasnt about debating the subject or whether or not to include it, it was about slandering those you view as 'intolerant' and getting your way. If you hadnt started it off that way, it wouldve been a different ordeal.

Cleod will post whenever he gets it working. In the mean time

Hey so guys we have gender now, but keep in mind that if the user choose N/A nothing will show up