If it isn't their idea of 'fun' they're just gonna s#%$& on it. js.

Or if there isn't any "bragging rights" it isn't worth it, because it isnt a "competitive format"

f#%$&, lmao.

If it crashes and burns, then good. It's a learning experience. I'd much rather run an unconventional ruleset and get the community experimenting than to copy and paste everyone else's ruleset. But I guess it's too much to ask for more than three entrants unless I copypaste X or Smash Island's ruleset, lmfao.

I'm pretty sick of how one-dimensional our tournaments end up being. I mostly understand that tours have to play it safe, but it's pretty dumb how change-resistant the community is. It's almost toxic that a tournament with even just a different stock setup, or different time setup is near-laughable. I'll assume the stagelist stuff is the thing that's really "funny" to you, though.
I'll just say this - we could have a good tier list shuffle if every match wasn't on Smashville and people learned how stages work and which ones benefit/detriment which characters. No. I'm not talking about a stage with one platform versus a stage with two. Imagine; we discover two stages that MK and ZSS are really bad on. Suddenly the entire metagame changes because you can counterpick to these stages. Or, you could be lazy and type "GM 2 SV? LOL" in the chat and get f*** wrecked.

I mean, you (and everyone else) can continue copypasting your rulesets and maybe switchin' in a stage once every 8 tournaments in your tour, that's fine. But don't throw shade when I want to test, experiment, and encourage some community/metagame evolution.

I apologize for inventing what eventually became the modern ruleset for this game.

Lol, you didn't do s***.

When every tournament literally copy-pastes large portions of your rules...

Anyway, where's Bowser's Castle? =P