I will probably not post after the timeline, maybe I'll probably come to post in Sunday. Just a heads up.

Shouldn't there be 10 alive, not 11?

Woops typo.

So we just lost our main source of security...

Well that sucks royally.

Also, I'm 99% sure there's no Assassin which means that the only way that the Mafia members are going to die is if we lynch them.

As I said 'yesterday' I'm pretty suspicious of Weaville. He should know Believeblood is an idiot quite thoroughly and the fact that Believeblood often makes incredibly stupid or illogical arguments and that the responses he made were really only natural. This logic is based on the large amount of time spent in similar areas (A&D, SSF2, Forum Games) etc. Weaville may not be the brightest on the block himself, but I'm pretty sure he's not that dumb. Most other people who voted against him probably did so as a result of mob mentality, so they're off the hook, but Weaville, the one who started it, had no peers to be pressured by.

I'm not going to vote for him until I get a confirmation that 5 other people will vote for him so that we can't kill an innocent Gallis, but I'd like to know what you guys think.

Also, I forgot to add: everyone must be incredibly careful to keep their role to themselves now that we have no protection. If the mafia believes someone is important, they die. We can not give them any reason to suspect our importance. Should we play up our importance, the mafia may believe us and kill us. Should we downplay our importance, the mafia may get suspicious and kill us. We have no back up or protection. It all comes down to what we do now. Be careful.

Did our investigative role get anything useful last night?

Oh.
Well like I said yesterday, if we have no leads, we should probably vote for the next best thing.
Vote: Weaville

I'm going with Tid on this one. Like |~DVDV~| said, Weavile had no peers to be pressured by, which means he voted BelieveBlood because of his own reasons, not for everyone sake of killing the Mafia. In your say to Believeblood's Lynching, you said that:

Which pretty much means that you want to kill someone that might have been a townie (already proven by yesturday's lynching)

Vote: Weavile

I just want to throw this out there: now that we lack a protective role, our investigative role will have no form of protection. What do you guys think we should do about this?

Not much we can do, other than hope the people playing The Mafia are really stupid.

Eh, if people have already started voting for Weaville, then waiting for a majority's not going to help much anymore...

Vote: Weaville

Also, I'm hoping our role cop's doing something useful. All I'm hearing is 'no results sorry' from both the investigator and the role-revealer.

Unless our investigative role got a guilty reading last night, at best they know of three people's innocence. That's good, and it may help us avoid another potential mistake, but we still won't have a confirmed guilty party that we can lynch in all confidence. Thinking through the situation, I'm not quite sure how to proceed. Should we avoid lynching until our investigator gets a guilty reading, thus providing us with a sure mafia kill and no chance of lynching a townie? Personally, I think not, since it's very likely that the investigator won't survive the night, seeing as all of our protective roles have died. On the other hand, what have we got to go on? I'm thinking it might be a good idea to prolong the day a bit longer than usual. This will give us a better chance to try and read people before we make a final decision. We don't want a repeat of yesterday.

Edit: Honestly, I don't really understand why Weavile is under suspicion right now. Sure, he may have started the Believeblood mob-lynch, but mistakes are bound to happen in the early rounds. What we should look out for is those who would seek to use that as an opportunity to lead us to another mistake.

I think it's safe to say that the shooting role isn't the assassin. This means that day lynches are more important.

Also, I'm suspicious of Weaville as he knows Believeblood fairly well, yet forgot the fact that Believeblood is pretty incompetent regarding his use of English. I'd like to think I've got some grasp of Weaville's intelligence and I think it's high enough that otherwise he'd be able to decipher what Believeblood means through the lack of clarity. The fact that he couldn't only makes me think that he's choosing to ignore his previous knowledge and trying to pin the kill on Believeblood in order to help him and the other mafia members.

What Genis Potter just said was stupid, but that's not reason to kill him right? I think I can vaguely make out some sort of logic in his posts (sometimes). But the lack of clarity isn't grounds to kill him and nor it shouldn't have been for Believeblood either. Heck, there are quite a few people who haven't been online lately who I'd be more suspicious of.

Then again, maybe I'm over-thinking things.

This time, when I say "what do you guys think" I want an answer, not a vote: the evidence you derived your opinions from and the thought process behind it.

Also, what happened to Dark Ermac and War P. Anda? They're never around it seems.

And Darksonic does an awful lot of not talking.