wow. an amazing post full of actual content. i give it an A++ out of 40

Had fun playing with Titan online. The lag was unbearable at the beginning, but slowly went away in our later matches. I need to fight the rest of you guys soon.

My current Wii doesn't have all the characters unlocked.

It'll be a while before I can face anyone here. But Project M, maybe sooner.

You really expect me to go into depth on a 40+ roster? Get your head out of your a** and maybe you'll stop thinking like a piece of s***.
I'll just say that CT players primarily play Melee, and characters who break the offensive flow of Melee are "broken" to them. You can see this with M2K whining about Ivysaur or how Zelda's anti-meta playstyle had her higher then Meta Knight and Lucas, when most Project M/Brawl players find Zelda mediocre and those two to be on the level of the Melee spacies. Not only that, but why is Marth still High, when Peach is low, despite being the same as Melee Peach but better? It's a pretty bias list.

Do I actually expect you to give reasons for an argument?

Of course I don't.

do you hand in essays without bibliographies

If anything this is more like handing in an essay title without an actual paper

I can't fathom how stupid this is. They said they agreed, I said I disagreed. There was no demand for me to go into depth.

Blindly saying "I agree with it" is just as much of an argument as what I delivered anyways.

yes congratulations you proved how dumb they were by doing the exact same thing they did

you're a genius please teach me your ways

There's nothing wrong with it, thinking something is wrong with it is dumb.

You also need to factor in the amount of people who play each said character, how well said character finishes in tournaments and what options they have against other characters.

I agree with the list for the most part except that Lucas should be a little higher on the list. I also think Kirby should be a little bit lower.

I can't see the imbalances in Project M. Every character is interesting, fun to play and hella effective at what they do. I really can't see how they got these tier placements.
_{Except Olimar. He is literally the only character that I didn't enjoy out of the WHOLE CAST.}

I'm far from a competitive mind, so maybe it's fitting that this baffles me.

Being 'fun to play', interesting and 'enjoyable' aren't factors that weight in when composing a tier list though. A character doesn't become low tier because people don't find the character enjoyable to play as.

@Kimihro: How much you enjoy a character doesn't determine how good they are.

Also, if you don't have a competitive mindset, then you really shouldn't comment on compettive matters such as tier list and matchup charts. It's honestly better for you to ignore them, so that you don't form ignorant opinions.

Well, to take a leaf from something I learned from Brawl, fun is not effective (IVYSAUR), but in Project M I have fun figuring out their strong suits as well. And the best part is that seemingly everyone has one that makes then viable, even after metagame shenanigans! I'm just too excited...

But part of who I am is constant questioning of what is. Tier lists give me"why's" and matchup charts as well. I just have to know. I'll try to stay neutral on opinions (because almost all of them are immediately shat on by hordes of naysayers), but the questions may never cease.

I wish there were like interviews on the makers so we can see the whys of the placements. I really wanna know how all the characters fit together.