Yes, but how many millions of websites are there?

if they do not know eachother, it becomes very unlikely 2, let alone 3 people will be on that website posting. At the same time, feralio here has replied to one of them. What're the chances?

In fact, both of these other accounts have ONLY posted from this school. Now, whys that? why is it neither of them have their own home IP? this is 2009 and they dont have any kind of personal computer around? I'd understand 1, maybe.

but this is the case for both. The other case can be viewed here.

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6808&st=0&sk=t&sd=a

Again he replies in a thread by someone using the same IP. Yet he does not know them, and he does not know this one either. Yet replied to them both. fer's other IP's show he has access from several other places, plenty in fact.

In that topic, he replied to Hakker after he was called out.
How can that be used as proof?

Him and the 'other' were consistently replying to one another on a very rapid basis. Fer never explained why he has multiple ip's from separate locations despite saying he only had access to a school computer, at the time.

Its these finer points, whimmy, one must be keen to look upon. One small inconvenient fact could unravel a whole lie. Which is why i requested him explain more about the situation, which he hasnt done. He was online for awhile after that post, as well.

He flat out ignored hakkers questioning on the Multip-Ip matter. There are other accounts, only posting from a school, that he's engaged in conversation with and yet does not know. There are holes in this whimmy, and theyre glaringly obvious.

I have given him time to explain rather than flat out banning. This is one website among millions, 3 people post from the same IP at a school and do not know each other, yet have quickly messaged one another on this forum, shortly after othey join. Whatre the chances of this whimmy?

Do note, in BOTH cases. He has responded to the thread, for whatever reason, very fast. He does not know them, so they might as well be across the world, and yet in either case he responds to the thread in a very swift manner.

I see your point, but I'm not sure, and rather, would like to stay out of this.

:\

There's a problem with part of your theory.

I friend and I both went on this one (now dead) forum site, both from the library, and we were worst enemies on that forum, then one day he asked if I went on it, and I gave him my user name....

So, it IS possible.

But, with the ignoring it is suspicious.

seriously consider the chances of that really happening >.> even if it really did to you.

How many people use the nets?

how many websites are there?

>.>

It isn't that there is a problem with the theory, its that its highly improbable. Its the internet, there are no definable answers. You can only go off of what is most likely the case based on what you have and know.

and currently, its leaning a little bit against him.

The DesuDudes were a group account that my tight circle of friends would use (which WAS a stupid idea...) which they never did anyway.

But I don't know Luxious.

About the "You posted in the thread" argument, I posted in the last few introduction topics as well.

And this one.

And you never said it was a group account before >.> Now you take responsibility for one of them huh? you were denying it then..

Back then, I was an idiot.
I freely admit that I was totally stupid at that time, and thought I could pretend I had nothing to do with the desududes.

I say we ban him, guilty or no.

Why?

Whoa.
Just... wow.

Uh, sorry, man...

Nini, dont suppose Luxious watched ferailo post on here, then came on here at school, and that ferailo reccomended these forums to the Desududes?

I've gone to a forum before along with other people in the school who I did not know. We met up in junior year.

I've met people online and then in real life with no type of coordination at all, just coincidence.

I find Nini's evidence to be insubstantial.

Hardly.

Millions of websites on the wide web and several linked accounts. 3 in total, all of which didn't know each other.

And he just now admits to the first occurrence being a ploy he knew about. That also arouses suspicion upon this occurance.

On the internet, all you can go by is chance. All i can ask myself is, what're the chances of a given situation with what i have to work with.

I find your rebuttal insubstantial.