This rule would allow the non-RPers one or more chances to be evaluated for the skills neccessary to RP. Although for this to work, everyone who isn't already proven to be a good RPer would have to be kicked out of RPers. Discuss.

We simply remove people who aren't good from the usergroup, and it works fine.

That's how pros work, but seriously, I don't think it'd be that bad to have random people on the internet RP. If they suck, they will be told so. No need to segregate them. Plus its better if they had an incentive to improve.

Yeah, people who go "pro" in it need to stay at the top only if their good. But, people who are not as great should still be let in for the fun. You can't really say "You suck, we don't want you" you want as many people to join (isn't the the purpose of a group)?

Perhaps we should do something like this for re-evaluations instead for those who were removed from the group?

lmfao nook is a standard rper

This is for the pro RP group right? If so, evaluation should be like every 2-3 weeks I guess. Keep them at the top of their game?

Hey, I'm just the springboard, bounce your modifications off of me!

You say that like you can forget how to RP...

It's like stealing a bicycle, you never forget.

That would make pros be a bit more active. I approve. Oh and Hakker, it's more like stealing cars, you never forget.

An evaluation every two to three weeks?

Just who, may I ask, would be the poor sap that would have to evaluate everyone?

Or am I missing a point?

All in favor of DH being the poor sap who has to evaluate everyone?


Anybody?

If this does go through, I doubt it though... I will volunteer to co-evaluate with somebody.

So does that mean poor fools like me actually might have a chance of RPing?

It's up to the higher-ups.