It's Pseudo vote. Pea Ess Ee Yu Dee Oh.

Pseudovotes are a completely good idea. We can already start to see patterns and who the general population perceives as scummiest.
Pseudovotes shouldn't give permission to lynch. We already have that. Pseudovotes give us a general idea of who the town wants to lynch.

Man, I just love starting new pages, don't I?

Yeah, gonna agree with DJ here. Treat them like real votes, then when we reach 8, everyone already PsuedoVoting uses a real vote.

Yeah, that would work out.

Terra, I don't like you asking about a massclaim when a few people had already done so and massclaims were shown as detrimental by 194. Also, you keeping fake vote counts could be a way of saying "Hey look I'm doing something useful" to keep people from looking at you

As for pseudovoting until we have enough for an actual lynch, could you really see nothing wrong with that? Every single person on a train massvoting all at once?
I still think my idea of actual voting until they're at L-2, stopping voting, confirming the lynch, then lynching is better. It adds real pressure

Generic reasoning here! This applies to pretty much any mafia game I know. Why did you think it was important to say now?

Because normally, we can remove them in time when we realize that we don't want to lynch a person, like TOWK said, we could find the real scum, the scum would lynch the person, and they would live another night.

With psuedovotes, you do not run the risk of quickhammering, as if the mafia quickhammers then boom incriminated without the lynch actually happening.

@TOWK: Or it could just be me actually trying to help the town. Seriously.
And I was fairly ignorant until then. Sorry about that. But I'm just curious: why don't you want me asking about massclaim even though it had already been asked?

Thinking about Arthur again... this will take some time.
~~~~
Nothing has changed since the last votecount.

1. No one is retarded enough to quickhammer a pseudovote because it isn't actually a quickhammer. If two Mafia quickhammer a person we left at L-1 with REAL votes, boom two scum caught.

2. Because you asking it again does nothing and looks like town fluff.

Yeah, this is true.

Ebwop
L-2 in my above post, not L-1. Two scum can't quick hammer someone at L-1, silly phone

I agree. This system is a pretty good idea.

The whole pseudo vote vs real vote thing is tricky.
Not really sure which method is better. In fact unless a person has shown themselves to be truly scummy I wouldn't have much reason to vote for them anyways.(other then reaction test, but we could pressure them with words too)

Semi V/LA today and tomorrow