It's funny that you just ignored the data about the environment I provided, which stated that the Sea of Galilee never freezes. It is even classified as a lake type that is either frozen for the major part of the year or never frozen. I also wonder how they would demonstrate the circumstance on a lake about two thousand years ago.



Though he knows we don't know proof of his existence, he does; hence omniscience.

What do you think of this? It is the purpose of belief to believe; you cannot believe on exclusively human-rational grounds, believing on those grounds would not be believing. Kierkegaard has written a lot about that.



Usually the argument is used to argue God is either not benevolent or omnipotent. However, the Problem of Evil is flawed in the sense that omnipotence combined with benevolence should inevitably lead to intervention. Though in Christian theology, there is such intervention actually, it is not a ostensibly direct as often longed for.

The point is that most people who use this argument the described way is that they overlook important notions, such as freedom and responsibility of action. If a deity would intervene every time we do something wrong in order to make it right again, we would be limited in our freedom and we would not have any responsibility of our own, neither personally nor collectively. You could reject this notion, but for instance all of our statecraft and legislation is based on the notion humans at least have responsibility. (This is actually not complete as you may have noticed, but I'll leave it at this for now.)

Moral: Reciting an argument from an ancient philosopher is not always going to be free from fallacy. [Though you did not use it as an argument and just as another example, I know. It is more of a "warning" to others.]



I can't help but enjoy the silence, I mean civil wording.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uA-mSoD6NV8

There is actually evidence for the big bang. Judging but the planets current trajectories, all planets originated from roughly the same spot. There is evidence for it, it just isn't proven

basically, Tid, your excuse for lets see some s***, might as well say, lets see some s*** that nothing causes nothing to suddenly happen.

I don't like blind faith - if you're going to put your life in someone's hands, you'd better have reason to believe that they're going to hold you

did i say no to the big bang theory? i made fun of your explanation of it you f***. and to our supposed dead end, how do you know God doesn't exist, f*** idiot.

did i say no to the big bang theory? i made fun of your explanation of it you f***. and to our supposed dead end, how do you know God doesn't exist, f*** idiot.

Ahah
Thanks Angel, you always make me smile. Like literally, I just laughed out loud.
So. A book which has absolutely no proof or fact behind it suggesting some powerful dude who we've never met before or in fact had any sign to suggest he existed creating the universe with a click of his fingers or whatever follows the laws of physics.
But what has been proven multiple times to have happened by scientists doesn't. Yeah I get it now. Thanks.