King Arthur:Scummy
*I have already written arguments against him
194:Null, leaning towards scum
*I have already written arguments against him
Ramsey:Scummy
*I have already written arguments against him
Brik:Townish
His arguments are backed up by solid evidence, and he spots contradictions fairly easily in other people's posts. He has helped to move the town forward.
Lightning:Null, leaning towards town
Lightning did not really suspect anyone, or put pressure on people to gather information. In addition to that, he did not say anything about Panthera's arguments. However, he has helped the town move forward a bit from his reads.
TheOneWhoKnocks:Null
Has had some scummy posts, and some townish posts. Null.
Dephius:Townish
His arguments have evidence in them, and his reaction tests helped with the reads on Panthera. Townish.
Blood:Scummy
His accusations against me make no sense. He accused me of insulting Felipe's language, which I did not do. He was using atrocious wording in his posts, (eg:stupid, retarded). And Felipe did not say more than most of the people who voted for Pathera. For example. Dephius gave a fairly reasonable explanation as to why he voted for Pathera. What was Felipe's explanation? 'He is waaaaaaaaay scummy' Also, my read on Felipe was also based on him 'lurking', but as soon as 194 told me that he wasn't and he told us that he was on holiday, I moved him off my scum list. That doesn't mean that he can't be leaning towards scum, now does it?
Terra:Townish
He has been giving a lot of reads, and questioning people's arguments fairly well.
kyuubit:Null, leaning towards town
Has been helping the town a bit, giving reaction tests every now and then.
Bonsaitoad:Null, leaning towards scum
Has not been helping the town that much. I sense lurking, because, for some reason, he only has posted three times up until now.
Felipe:Null, leaning towards scum
I have not played any games with him yet, as this is my first with him inside, so I have yet to understand his logic yet. However, his only 'slightly scum read' that he has on me is that I 'jump on too many people'. I have said it before, and I shall say it once again. I only object to their arguments, with walls of text. Maybe that's why you think that I 'jump on too many people'.
Mr.Shoop:Scummy
He has only posted irrelevant stuff, and has tried to convince us to No-lynch. He also says that he does not want to vote Cactus. Why? We have yet to find out. He also calls Ramsey only a 'bit' scummy. Why? I've even written paragraphs about how he is really scummy. He also accused me of something, in which I will quote the first part.

Wrong. My first few posts was answering the questions given to all of us, objecting to Panthera, 194, and Ramsey's argument 'about starting from scratch and trying to scumhunt from there'. Mr. Shoop, I can see that you are trying to accuse me of something I did not do. And I did not change the topic after I asked a question, a few posts later. I continued pushing Ramsey for answers, but he gave flawed excuses on why we should follow Panthera. I also did not go into 'defense mode'. You are trying to falsely accuse me of being scum, aren't you? With no solid evidence, I find it hard to believe you.
Lukepi:Null
Not many posts from him, so I can't make sure.
Thomas:Null
Not many posts from him, so I can't make sure.
Panthera:Scum
I have written many paragraphs against him, talking about how his logic is faulty and how he is trying to stall for time. A lot of people have also written arguments against him too.